Let Q(x) be a predicate defined in this domain.
(a) Give a formal proof that (∀y Q(y)) → ∃x (Q(x) → ∀yQ(y)).
(b) Give a formal proof that ¬(∀y Q(y)) → ∃x (Q(x) → ∀yQ(y)).
(c) Why can we conclude from parts (a) and (b) that ∃x (Q(x) →∀y Q(y)) is a tautology?
Answer